Another couple of hands
I noticed on Bluescouse's Blog that his latest post mentions a hand he played vs me recently. This was in my database but they are all empty for some reason but I can remember it from memory although it is a pretty boring hand. I have rarely played Bluescouse as far as I know with probably the last time being well over a year ago.
It was towards the end of his session at $5000NL. He had been raising far too much, pretty much any time anyone folded to him. I hadn't been playing long, perhaps thirty minutes when I picked up AA vs him. He raised to $150 and I reraised to either $600 or $650 from the blinds. He called with position. We both had $5000.
The flop came J64 or some similar style flop. I cbet around $1000 and he called. The turn was a total blank and I jammed in for a full pot sized bet of around $3400. He called quite quickly with only 34, a pair of fours with no draw. $9800 pot. He quit soon after.
The other interesting hand to me that I played vs him although not a big pot was the following from near the the start of the session :-
He raised to $150 from middle position and I called from the big blind with 8
9
.
The flop came T
4
J
. I checked and he bet $300 which I called with my open ended straight draw.
The turn was the A
. I checked and he also checked.
The river was the 6
. This is a great card for me to bluff at because my hand should look exactly like a draw to him or at the very least a two pair type hand which I checked to him on the turn. I bet very close to pot, so at least an $800 bet. Notice how every single draw has hit apart from precisely 89 and 9Q. Even if he doesn't think I have a draw he should be able to take me off any reasonable hands such as JQ, J9, Axs, Tx etc as he shouldn't expect me to bet at all with any of those hands let alone this confidently. If I was him I would have folded in his spot probably close to 100% of the time versus a competent player except in exceptional circumstances. I think this hand is a perfect example of a very bad call on the river versus the possible range of hands that a reasonable player(me) can have here. The range of hands he can beat probably amounts to exactly 89 and 9Q(and more to the point only three combinations of 89 and 9Q, suited clubs, suited spades and suited diamonds) in this spot or a rare large value bet with a weak ace or an even rarer float on the flop. Unfortunately for him it will reinforce such calls in the future, which I guess isn't bad for me in the long run =).
He called with A
Q
and scooped the $2500 pot. I didn't bluff him for the rest of this session =) It is probably surprising to some people how weak AQ actually is in this spot. To be at least somewhat fair to him, he did let his timer go all the way to zero so some thought must have gone into the call. He must have seen how unlikely it was that he was ahead here or perhaps not since he called. If you look at AQ in isolation on the river and don't think about ranges or actions then I guess it is understandable why you will see a call here often so in that respect my bluff is very likely bad vs him with this suspicion being reinforced by the fact that he did in fact call in this instance.
It was towards the end of his session at $5000NL. He had been raising far too much, pretty much any time anyone folded to him. I hadn't been playing long, perhaps thirty minutes when I picked up AA vs him. He raised to $150 and I reraised to either $600 or $650 from the blinds. He called with position. We both had $5000.
The flop came J64 or some similar style flop. I cbet around $1000 and he called. The turn was a total blank and I jammed in for a full pot sized bet of around $3400. He called quite quickly with only 34, a pair of fours with no draw. $9800 pot. He quit soon after.
The other interesting hand to me that I played vs him although not a big pot was the following from near the the start of the session :-
He raised to $150 from middle position and I called from the big blind with 8
9
.The flop came T
4
J
. I checked and he bet $300 which I called with my open ended straight draw.The turn was the A
. I checked and he also checked.The river was the 6
. This is a great card for me to bluff at because my hand should look exactly like a draw to him or at the very least a two pair type hand which I checked to him on the turn. I bet very close to pot, so at least an $800 bet. Notice how every single draw has hit apart from precisely 89 and 9Q. Even if he doesn't think I have a draw he should be able to take me off any reasonable hands such as JQ, J9, Axs, Tx etc as he shouldn't expect me to bet at all with any of those hands let alone this confidently. If I was him I would have folded in his spot probably close to 100% of the time versus a competent player except in exceptional circumstances. I think this hand is a perfect example of a very bad call on the river versus the possible range of hands that a reasonable player(me) can have here. The range of hands he can beat probably amounts to exactly 89 and 9Q(and more to the point only three combinations of 89 and 9Q, suited clubs, suited spades and suited diamonds) in this spot or a rare large value bet with a weak ace or an even rarer float on the flop. Unfortunately for him it will reinforce such calls in the future, which I guess isn't bad for me in the long run =).He called with A
Q
and scooped the $2500 pot. I didn't bluff him for the rest of this session =) It is probably surprising to some people how weak AQ actually is in this spot. To be at least somewhat fair to him, he did let his timer go all the way to zero so some thought must have gone into the call. He must have seen how unlikely it was that he was ahead here or perhaps not since he called. If you look at AQ in isolation on the river and don't think about ranges or actions then I guess it is understandable why you will see a call here often so in that respect my bluff is very likely bad vs him with this suspicion being reinforced by the fact that he did in fact call in this instance.

